
When
the MGA had been announced in 1955, it had set new standards for MG in terms of
performance and styling, but by the beginning of the 1960's it had become
slightly out-dated. Sports car design had moved up a gear, particularly in terms
of comfort and the prospective sports car buyer was demanding more
sophistication than the MGA was able to deliver. For MG's sake, the replacement
needed to offer better performance and a greater degree of comfort. History has
now shown that the new car did have these features, for it was the venerable
MGB, a car which was to sell over five times the numbers of MGA.
Like
the Austin-Healey Sprite and later the MG Midget, the MGB was to be of unitary
construction which brought a number of advantages. The design of the body was
such that the individual panels when welded together, produced box-like
structures of immense strength.
The
engine and transmission came directly from the MGA, but the b-series engine had
been increased in capacity to 1789cc, which resulted in 94bhp, and a diaphragm
clutch was used between the engine and transmission. As standard, the car was
supplied with bolt-on steel disc wheels, similar to those of the MGA but of a
slightly smaller diameter.
The
MGB was extremely well received by the press who were fulsome in their praise of
the new car, which was capable of exceeding 100mph without any fuss. Performance
handling and economy were all of a high standard for the time, which resulted in
a thoroughly reliable sports car that was a joy to drive. It found a ready
market, particularly in the USA.
When
the MGB was introduced in 1962, it was a two-seat open roadster with squared-off
styling which was in the Midget mould, and was to endure. It had a pancake-style
rear hinged bonnet, full width grille, scalloped recesses for the headlamps in
the tops of the front wings, a separate boot with a hinged lid, and canted rear
lights in the ends of the rear wings. The windscreen was a curved item, there
was a removable soft-top, and the doors had wind-up windows with hinged
quarterlights.
In
the cockpit, driver and passenger had separate seats, and full instrumentation
was provided, and a tonneau cover to cover the space behind the seats when the
hood was down.
The
MGB was a bit shorter than the MGA, but the design was such that MG had managed
to make the cockpit roomier which allowed larger, more comfortable seats to be
added.
A
year later in 1963, among the options offered for the MGB were an overdrive for
the transmission, centre-lock wire wheels, and a folding soft-top that could be
stowed behind the seats. And in 1964 a much stronger bottom-end for the engine,
derived from the BMC 1800, was fitted.
In
the tradition of the earlier MG sports cars, the MGA had been built with a
separate chassis to provide support and strength to the car, and to carry all
the mechanical components and the body. By the end of the 1950's however,
methods of car construction had moved on , and the days of the separate chassis
were almost over. Unitary construction was now the name of the game, whereby a
cleverly designed bodyshell constructed from a number of metal panels with a
reinforced floorpan, provided mountings for all the mechanical components and
absorbed all the loads from the suspension etc. The advantage of this type of
construction was that it produced a much lighter car, which has obvious
performance benefits for a sports car.
Hence,
the MGB was to be built of unitary construction. At the front, the inner wing
panels, front panel, and engine compartment bulkhead formed one box; the
scuttle, bulkhead, and front floor formed another; while the rear inner wings,
boot floor, and rear panels formed another. Box section strengthening pieces
were added to the floor to stiffen it and provide mountings for the rear
suspension, while additional box sections ran along the bottoms of the front
inner wings for the engine and suspension mountings.
The
front suspension and steering were much like the MGA, although there were minor
differences. At the rear were the familiar semi-elliptic springs controlled by
lever-arm dampers. The engine and transmission were also MGA sourced, again with
some minor changes.
In
1965 came a coupe version of the MGB - the MGB GT, which had an attractive and
functional closed version of the standard body. In appearance, the front end,
front and rear wings, and doors were essentially the same as the roadster, but
the windscreen was slightly higher to allow for a higher roof line on the car.
The roof ran back in a gentle curve over the doors and rear side windows before
sloping down into the rear panel. In the place of the roadsters small boot lid
was a much larger hinged tailgate that provided access to the loadspace inside,
making it one of the earliest examples of the now popular hatchback car.
Inside,
a small rear seat was provided but this was not much use except for carrying
children. However, the seat could be folded flat to provide a large load
platform for luggage, making the GT a really useful two-seat touring car.
Although the coupe bodywork made the MGB much heavier, its shape actually helped
the cars performance by the improvement in aerodynamics the roof brought. This
gave the GT a slightly higher top speed than the roadster, and also an
improvement in handling since the roof put more weight over rear end, but this
weight had a detrimental effect on the cars acceleration. The MGB GT was not
only a good looking car, but it offered saloon car comfort levels with a sports
cars performance. As a result, the GT became very popular with those who wanted
something more civilised than a roadster.
Both
models continued until 1967, when the MGB MkII was introduced, still in open and
GT forms. The most significant difference was that the new model had a new
transmission with synchromesh on all four gears, and a better set of ratios.
This necessitated widening of the transmission tunnel, which also allowed MG to
offer the option of automatic transmission, which may seem strange for a sports
car but it was felt that new customers attracted by the GT would take to the
idea.
Also
in 1967 a new MG model was introduced. This car was based on the MGB, and was
intended as a replacement for the Austin-Healey 3000 which had had its day. This
was the MGC.
By
the late 1960's, the MGB was beginning to be affected by exhaust emission and
safety legislation which required frequent modifications to the cars
specification. This was particularly the case with those models destined for
export, especially for the USA.
Detail modifications continued until 1970 when the most obvious change was to a
matt black recessed grille which, unlike the original grille, had no obvious
link to the MG grille of old. Other changes included modified rear lights,
Rostyle sculpted steel wheels, and revised interior .
There
was also a change to SU HIF carburettors in an effort to improve the exhaust
emissions problem.
In
1973, another big engined MGB appeared on the scene, but unlike the MGC, this
one was to be extremely well received to the extent that demand far outstripped
supply. But in spite of this, this car was also to disappear after a relatively
short production run - it was the MGB GT V8.
It
is often assumed that it was the private venture of Ken Costello in 1971 which
precipitated Abingdon into producing the V8-engined MGB, but this is not true.
Costello was an enthusiast who ran a tuning business. The first Abingdon
experiments with a V8 engine were taking place well before Costello work was
being publicized. In fact, the first Abingdon prototype was registered in 1970.
One of the reasons Costello stole a march on the manufacturers was that he had
no corporate "red tape" to deal with! While MG were was dealing with
the problems of type approval and other modifications, Costello was able to
shoehorn the engine into place on a custom-built basis, and had produced a few
dozen cars between 1971 and 1973. The Abingdon version was announced in 1973,
just two months after Costello's cars had come to the public eye.
The
car made use of the 3532cc aluminium Rover V8 engine as was being used in the
Range Rover. Developed from an early Buick design, the engine was very light in
weight - it actually weighed less than the original B-series MGB engine - and in
standard tune offered a healthy 137bhp. It fitted snugly into the MGB's engine
bay after only slight modification to the bulkhead, and with the development of
a low-rise exhaust manifold allowed MG to use the standard MGB bonnet.
Furthermore, the engine could, unlike in the MGC, be fitted without dispensing
with the front suspension crossmember, so the coil-spring type suspension could
be retained. The standard suspension was employed at the rear too, but the ride
height was increased by an inch all round. The engine was mated to the MGC
gearbox and rear-end transmission, although the ratios were slightly modified.
The
combination of the Rover V8 engine and the MGB produced an excellent touring car
with high performance, good economy, and good handling. The press received it
well and it found a ready market, although it was never exported to the USA for
some unknown reason.
In
1976, the car was killed off, supposedly because of the limited supply of
engines, which were being built under licence and were required for Rover's new
SD1 saloon. Another contributing factor to the cars demise was the fuel crisis
which was experienced in 1975, which led people to buy smaller engined, more
economical cars. Given the obvious success of the car, it seems strange that it
was ended, and possibly there was more to it than just these factors. The MGB GT
V8 was, after all, in much greater demand than Triumph's V8-engined Stag, which
continued in production...
Two
years earlier, in 1974, both roadster and GT (including the V8) had received the
black "5mph" bumpers and an increase in ride height, in much the same
way as the Midget had done. The front bumper was shaped to merge into the grille
which at least had a token resemblance to the earlier traditional shape. As with
the Midget, the weight of the bumpers and increased ride height did nothing to
the cars handling, increasing roll and oversteer. An attempt was made to rectify
this problem in 1976, when stabilisers were fitted to the front and rear
suspension, which was quite successful and considerably improved the cars
handling.
The
MGB continued in this form, with further detail changes to the specification,
until production finally came to an end in 1980. By then the car was definitely
past its best, but there was no replacement to be had. Development work had been
stopped at Abingdon, for British Leyland preferred to concentrate on their
Triumph products. It was claimed that BL were losing money on every MGB built,
but this was hard to believe since there were few major changes to the cars
specification over the years, so development costs must have been recouped long
before the end.
However,
the end it was, not just for the MGB, but for MG and Abingdon as a separate
entity within the British Leyland group. The plant was closed, but the stir this
caused among MG enthusiasts around the world caused the parent company to
realise that the MG name was a valuable commodity. While it was thought that the
MG name as a sports car manufacturer was dead, the name lived on being carried
by a number of BLs sporting saloons, and is now being re-born by the now Rover
Group in the guise of new sports cars - the MG RV8 and the new MGF.